new york estate planning

ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN WILL OR TRUST

Published on: February 3, 2016 | by Ettinger Law Firm

NEW YORK RULE ON ARBITRATION FOR PROBATE DISPUTES

The idea of using quasijudicial means to settle disputes is as old as the country itself. More specifically arbitration is a method that parties utilize that is usually cheaper, quicker and often with much less formality, yet still adheres to principles of fundamental fairness. George Washington famously included a proviso in his will that outlined a method to arbitrate certain disputes in the execution of his will. Certainly this was no minor matter, as President Washington was perhaps the wealthiest landowner in Virginia and by extension maybe the wealthiest American at the time.

In today’s dollars, President Washington would be worth an estimated half a billion dollars, succeeded by perhaps only President John F. Kennedy’s wealth. By the time of President Washington’s passing in 1799, arbitration was already well established in the United States. New York no longer permits arbitration in the context of a dispute over a last will and testament, as it would unconstitutionally interfere with the power of the Surrogate’s Court to adjudicate disputes involving the disposition and transfer of property of decedents, the administration of estates and probate of wills. Matter of Jacobovitz, 58 Misc. 2d 330 (Nassau County, 1968). The same cannot be said of arbitration clauses in trust documents. There is much diversity of treatment of arbitration clauses found in trust documents, with New York taking a middle of the road approach to interpretation and enforcement of arbitration clauses in trust documents. That principle, however, only applies to the application of the transfer of property via an individual’s last will and testament. It does not apply to the mediation and adjudication of disputes in trust documents controlled by New York law.

INHERITING A LEASE

Published on: December 12, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

VALUABLE ASSET

A residential lease in New York City or any desirable locale can provide many benefits. Some people wait years to get into a rent stabilized apartment. There is even a Seinfeld episode where Elaine quips that some people scan the obituaries to see if someone in a rent stabilized apartment has passed away. It is a common occurrence for many people to live decades and raise generations of families in their rent controlled rental unit. Many cities have their own laws dealing with how to inherit these leases. New York Real Property Actions and Proceedings §236 law deals permits an estate to inherit the lease of a deceased person and New York Estate Powers and Trusts Laws §13-1.1(a)(1) also holds that a lease is an asset of an estate. In addition, many local laws housing and regulations also mandate how and when a lease may be inherited. New York City ended its Rent Control laws in 1971, yet still has approximately 38,000 rental units listed under the old Rent Control laws, as once the lease is under the Rent Control law it remains until it is no longer. Going forward New York leases are generally covered by Rent Stabilization laws, also covered by the same laws dealing with succession of a residential lease. Rental units under the rent stabilization laws are the most common type of residential lease. These leases will remain for so time due to the right to succeed these leases by other family members or even friends. Most particularly, New York Code, Rules and Regulations §2532.5(b) allows for family members to succeed the lease. Landlords have been known to fight like the devil to regain possession of these rentals, sometimes offering cold hard cash, from $40,000 on the low end to $17,000,000 on the high end.

HOW TO INHERIT OR SUCCEED – COHABITATION

WHEN YOUR ATTORNEY IS A POTENTIAL WITNESS IN SURROGATE COURT

Published on: November 16, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

WITNESS ADVOCATE RULE

In New York, as well as perhaps every other jurisdiction, an attorney may not serve as an attorney as well as a witness in the same case. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.7 is mandatory and not permissive. It does not matter if it is a bench trial, jury trial, traffic court case or surrogate’s court case. In fact, the rule is so important to judicial administration that even partners and members of the same firm cannot act as a witnesses. Courts refer to the issue as the lawyer-witness rule and it comes up often enough in surrogate court cases. The June 2, 2015 case of Will of Lublin, 2015 NY Slip Op 31038(U) is a good example of how estate lawyers face these issues. While the lawyer in Lublin avoided the issue of Rule 3.7, a small change could have made it not so. Very briefly, the decedent, Mr. Irving Lublin, executed a will in 1997 and passed away in 2010. Someone objected, claiming that the decedent did not have sufficient mental capacity to create such a will, the will was not properly executed and that the will was the result of fraud and undue influence. The lawyer who drafted the will was deposed during the discovery phase. If, perhaps, the attorney who created the will also represented the executor, an entirely plausible and even relatively normal scenario, the attorney would be disqualified, as he/she would be a material witness.

UNIQUE POSITION IN THE CASE

Back to the Basics – Wills and the Blended Family

Published on: October 20, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Ensuring that your family knows what happens to your property and assets after your death is always a challenge. A Will can help make the decision less challenging and provide solid guidance to your family at a difficult time. A Will is a legal document, which decides who receives your real and personal property at your death. A Will can also be used to select an estate executor. The executor is the person, or people, you choose to oversee and manage the distribution of assets from your estate. Many people choose to have a will so that they are able to adequately provide for their children and spouse after their death.

If you do not have a Will, your estate will be distributed according to the intestacy laws of your state. Intestacy laws reflect lawmaker’s attempt to figure out how you would like to distribute property and assets among your children and surviving spouse. These laws are complex in most states and become even more complex for non-traditional and blended families – the law can make a wrong decision for your family.

Blended Family

Planning for the Succession of Your Small Business

Published on: October 7, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

A recent Forbes article reported that while most family business owners do have estate plans, many do not update their estate plans regularly. Many circumstances can change over just the course of a few years, which makes a regular review of any estate plan necessary in order to capture planning opportunities and evaluate risk. For small business owners, it is also a good way to review their family business succession plan, which can help ensure the continuity of their business assets, manage tax liability, and avoid dilemmas that typically occur in closely held family enterprises.

Business Succession and Estate Planning

For many family business owners their business not only represents their greatest source of wealth, it represents a heritage and opportunity for the next generation. As such, family business owners have a strong motivation and obligation to plan for the transfer of their business assets. By not implementing a business succession plan, the value created over so many years will be at risk. Depending on the size of the business and other sources of wealth, failing to plan over the long term can create a greater potential for estate tax liability and put the family business at risk in the event of an unplanned transition. For these reasons, family business owners should create and continuously monitor a business succession strategy as part of their estate planning process.