New York Estate Planning & Elder Law Blog

PROTECTING SENIORS – UNDERSTANDING ELDER ABUSE

Published on: November 19, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

NEW YORK LAW ON ELDER ABUSE

New York, much like every other state in the country, has a system in place to deal with elder abuse. It is both preventative and remedial in nature. Many people are more familiar with analogous child abuse protection laws. Unlike child abuse protection laws, New York does not have a mandatory reporting law and does not maintain a central registry on data on elder abuse. In fact, New York is one of only four states that does not mandate reporting of elder abuse. Unique amongst the states, New York has no law at all dealing with reporting. It should be noted, however, that as of writing of the present, Assembly Bill A3743 for the 2015-2016 legislative session is pending which would create a mandatory reporting law and a central registry.

PREVALENCE OF ELDER ABUSE

FILIAL SUPPORT LAWS

Published on: November 16, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

LAWS THROUGHOUT THE STATES

More than half the states have filial support laws on their books. Most states that still have filial support laws as part of its statutory code rarely enforce them. The last time that Georgia successfully enforced its filial support law was 1936. Filial support laws are now coming back into focus, as judged by the relatively recent case of John Pittas in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania more than most states has a more regular history of enforcement of its filial support statute, as judged from the several cases from 1994 and 2003. Louisiana recently enacted a filial responsibility act on June 29, 2015. North Dakota enforced its filial support law in 2013 when Four Season’s Healthcare Center sought payment from Elden Linderkamp, although the outcome of that case placed much weight on an allegedly fraudulent transfer of the parents land. These cases are the outliers, however.

ENFORCEMENT IN NEW YORK

WHEN YOUR ATTORNEY IS A POTENTIAL WITNESS IN SURROGATE COURT

Published on: November 16, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

WITNESS ADVOCATE RULE

In New York, as well as perhaps every other jurisdiction, an attorney may not serve as an attorney as well as a witness in the same case. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.7 is mandatory and not permissive. It does not matter if it is a bench trial, jury trial, traffic court case or surrogate’s court case. In fact, the rule is so important to judicial administration that even partners and members of the same firm cannot act as a witnesses. Courts refer to the issue as the lawyer-witness rule and it comes up often enough in surrogate court cases. The June 2, 2015 case of Will of Lublin, 2015 NY Slip Op 31038(U) is a good example of how estate lawyers face these issues. While the lawyer in Lublin avoided the issue of Rule 3.7, a small change could have made it not so. Very briefly, the decedent, Mr. Irving Lublin, executed a will in 1997 and passed away in 2010. Someone objected, claiming that the decedent did not have sufficient mental capacity to create such a will, the will was not properly executed and that the will was the result of fraud and undue influence. The lawyer who drafted the will was deposed during the discovery phase. If, perhaps, the attorney who created the will also represented the executor, an entirely plausible and even relatively normal scenario, the attorney would be disqualified, as he/she would be a material witness.

UNIQUE POSITION IN THE CASE

PLANNING FOR YOUR PETS IN YOUR ESTATE

Published on: November 12, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

NEW YORK TRUSTS FOR PETS

Some animals are undoubtedly beloved pets. They provide us with love and companionship, while there are other animals that are more than pets. For example, horses are an investment, they are a partner in exercise, they help some children with therapy and a comrade to see the world with if you ever had the distinct pleasure of exploring the wilderness on horseback. Seeing eye dogs or other therapeutically trained animals are literal life savers in some cases. All of these animals are deserving of the full legal protections that you can provide to them. Pet trusts are not tools reserved for the rich and eccentric. As of 2012, 46 states (and the District of Columbia) have laws in effect that allow for pet trusts. In 1996, the New York legislature enacted NY EPTL § 7-8.1, which allows for the care of any pet or animal by way of a trust, which terminates when the beneficiary animal dies. In fact, pet trusts are so popular and well ingrained in the law, that there is a model, uniform law, found at Uniform Trust Code 402. Pet trusts are now practically commonplace.

WILL VERSUS TRUST

WHAT IS LOST AFTER DIAGNOSIS OF DEMENTIA

Published on: November 7, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

LEGAL RIGHTS

The highly charged trial of former Iowa legislature Henry V. Rayhons is now over. Five months ago, jurors voted to acquit the Defendant of third degree sexual assault. One of the voting jurors was a local reporter who wrote a revealing and no doubt personally difficult article. The article and ultimate outcome of the case should give pause to anyone who thinks that our system of justice is broken. By all accounts, the jurors all made their decision based on the evidence and took their job seriously and with the utmost integrity. The larger question that the case spawns, which can now be discussed given that some time has elapsed, is the issue of what rights do dementia patients retain? More particularly, can a dementia patient consent to intimate contact with loved ones? For example, can a husband of over 50 years, in the privacy of his wife’s room embrace her in an intimate and loving fashion? What if the grandchild gives the same loving embrace? Can the spouse sleep in the same bed without concern for legal liability? Leaving the issue of intercourse aside, sexual expression is perhaps one of the most profound and important rights.

MEDICAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVE

LACKING IN MENTAL CAPACITY AND FAMILY, WHO DECIDES

Published on: November 6, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

On June 24, 2015 a trial Court in California invalidated a California law as unconstitutional, which created a default surrogate decision maker when that individual is mentally incapacitated and does not have a family member, or anyone else for that matter, to make key decisions for them. The law and the issues addressed are not limited to California. Even though by definition, the law deals with individuals with no proxy decision maker, that does not mean someone did not exist in the past or could not step up to become one. Proxy decision makers pass away themselves, they move or simply just fade away and no longer attend to their responsibilities. New York law deals with these issues in a rather collaborative way. In 2010, New York enacted the New York Family Health Care Decisions Act, which creates a decision ladder for medical professionals who need to know with whom to check with for certain critical decisions. It was designed to avoid the parade of horribles that the California law dealt with. Certainly, no one wants a loved one or relative, even a distant relative, to have to rely on these provisions; they are used as a last resort.

DETERMINATION OF INCAPACITY

In the absence of a health care proxy, The New York Family Health Care Decisions Act begins to shape decisions, for all intents and purposes, at the time of the determination of incapacity.

LONG TERM COMMUNITY CARE REPORT CARD

Published on: November 4, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

2015 REPORT ON LONG TERM COMMUNITY CARE FACILITY SAFETY AND INTEGRITY

On April 21, 2015, the Long Term Care Community Coalition issued a 30 page comprehensive report to document and report on the state of the long term care community. It was a report card of sorts, where the report notes “significant problems in resident care, quality of life and dignity are pervasive across the country.” Indeed, the report gives a failing grade for enforcement of the robust laws that provide promises of dignity and superior care. More specifically, the report notes that long term care facilities have “inadequate care staff” and provide subpar care, lacking in dignity “because there is nothing stopping them from doing otherwise.” There are too often little or no consequences when the facility fail to live up to the standards that they are contractually bound to, even when these shortcomings result in “significant suffering.”

The Coalition wrote an additional report focused on New York for various reasons. New York’s findings can be found here. The New York report is even more detailed, at least as judged from the fact that it is 18 pages longer than the national report.

WHAT OF MY ESTATE PLANNING IF MOVE TO ANOTHER JURISDICTION?

Published on: November 3, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Say you live here in New York and made significant plans to avoid probate. You have a will, own a business that you pass on and even set aside significant assets for your grandchildren. You worked hard to put your financial house in order. Now you find out that you have to move to another jurisdiction for work and will likely be there for some time. More likely than not your will and other plans to avoid probate will survive as legally enforceable documents in the new jurisdiction. Nevertheless, you worked hard for your plans to be finalized and do not want to live with the idea that “more likely than not” your plans will be followed. As such, it is always best to check with a local estate planning and review your plans.

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

There are a few things to keep in mind when it comes to decisions on where to live and changes in law and nuances on how to handle the change. Most laws are relatively uniform throughout the country. Procedure may be different but substantive laws are similar in many cases. Except when they are not. Some issues have two different ways of handling things. A good example is common law states versus community property states. Community property states are generally Rocky Mountain states and west (Louisiana and Wisconsin are the exceptions). There are some important differences in their approach to passing on assets between the two camps. Another factor to address is that you need to clarify your residence or domicile or you may end up paying taxes in two different states, as what happened to the heir to the Campbell’s soup fortune in 1939.

CAN AN HEIR BORROW AGAINST INHERITANCE?

Published on: October 31, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Perhaps your prodigal child wants to start a law firm or a medical practice and needs start up funding. You have some money set aside for your children’s and grandchildren’s inheritance but agree to loan them the money out of this fund. It’s not uncommon for these monies to be secured by a promissory note, even though many parents would not strictly enforce its terms. If the promissory note is not paid off by the time the parents pass away, it becomes an asset of the estate that must be accounted for. If it is a significant amount of money, the IRS or state tax authority will impute interest. If the parent decides to forgive the loan, that is usually considered taxable income to the child.

LOAN DOCUMENTS AND ESTATE DOCUMENTS CONTROL

The parent controls these issues and to the extent that it can be controlled during his or her life, they should be. Loans should be in writing, with the repayment schedule outlined. Most loans obtained on the open market have extensive outlines of the remedies that the creditor reserves. These are not necessary unless the parent actually intends to exercise these remedies. If no remedies are outlined in the document, the parent always has the right to document his or her intentions on how the estate should treat these loans.

DONATE MY BODY TO SCIENCE

Published on: October 29, 2015 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Donating an organ or even a whole body for scientific study or medical education is a relatively common event, which permits a person with perhaps a rare or not well understood disease to contribute to medical science. Even if the person passes without a disease or any unique characteristics, medical schools need these volunteers for very important work. Some people see their act as an act of charity, a way of giving a gift to society. Organ donation helps to reach even more people by providing spare parts for surgeons, for those who need a replacement organ or tissue. It has been estimated that 114,000 Americans are awaiting organ transplants and that one person is added to the list every 11 minutes and that each year 6,600 people die each year while on the organ transplant list.

ANATOMICAL GIFTS PERMITTED VIA WILL

In 2005, the New York legislature passed a law which made it easier to give an anatomical gift. Organ donation is easy enough now, as it can be a mere check the box designation on your driver’s license. No additional signatures or witnesses are needed. New York further permits a person to validly donate their organs or their whole body by way of will. If the will is later invalidated, the donation is considered valid and any physician or medical school acting on the gift is shielded from liability. Some people with religious or moral objections to donating their body may still decide to donate organs without violating their conscience or religion. Even with these provisions in place, it is still best to discuss these decisions with your family and loved ones.