New York Estate Planning & Elder Law Blog

Aside from federal and state tax, estate planning is a vital process for anyone seeking a risk-free future for they family. Without formation of a will, estate, or trust, assets are distributed pursuant to state law in the jurisdiction of residence of the decedent. The estate planning process ensures that a surviving spouse, children, and other named beneficiaries are in receipt of valuable assets according to a decedent’s wishes when state laws are inadequate. Here are ten essential reasons estate planning should be part of your retirement strategy.

1.     Financial Control

A constructive priority, estate planning offers enhanced financial control. Taxation also falls under this general framework of fiscal responsibility and reporting accountability. Control, the exercise of financial accounting management, enables an estate owner to dictate how assets will be transferred, held, and distributed during their life, and upon death. A testamentary document such as a will or estate document, established during a decedent’s life, is a written directive that provides a Trustee or Executor instructions for distribution of estate or trust assets to named beneficiaries.

When planning an international trust, a Clifford Trust will allow a grantor to transfer high net worth assets that produce taxable income into an estate’s trust with the option of reclaim at time of trust expiry. Though used little at present, the Clifford Trust offers the opportunity for high net worth beneficiaries tax relief. If planning an international trust involving foreign national beneficiaries, a Clifford Trust will protect heirs from withholding tax at time of transfer (12 Int’l Bus. Law. 394 (1984)).

Rules to ‘Clifford Trust’ Tax Shelters

Prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Clifford Trusts have been used to tax-shelter assets through transfer of earned income to children from a parent or grandparent’s estate. Post-enactment of the Act, it was mandated that Clifford Trust income be taxed to the grantor, making these trusts nearly obsolete since with exception of use as an effective legal means for large tax expense avoidance and to avoid withholding by international trusts involving foreign national family beneficiaries.

When retirement investors are considering assets for estate or trust transfer, one of the main priorities is the impact of risk. In the past several years, cryptocurrency assets have increased in popularity. Until 2017, Bitcoin and other digital currency assets were also considered as tax-exempt “property” under federal Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) guidelines. Recent IRS rule reform of tax-exempt treatment of cryptocurrency assets reflects a growing concern about the lack of direct oversight of digital currency within the regulatory environment. Identified as the most significant risks of cryptocurrency asset transfer within policy formation at this time: pricing transparency, price manipulation, as well as the potential for fraud scams, custody disputes, and liquidity issues.

How CFTC & SEC Oversight Will Help

Regulatory oversight of price transparency and control over price fixing, and price manipulation is uneven across national and international markets. For this reason, digital currency cannot be traded on regulated financial markets. Derivatives like Bitcoin futures trading on the CBOE or CME offer investors the least risky investment for profit.

A Kings County Surrogate’s Court judge recently removed the executor to an estate without a hearing over the individual’s failure to comply with the court’s order to properly account of the estate’s assets. The case is a prime example of how and why someone can be removed as the executor from estate if he or she fails to comply with their fiduciary duty to faithfully discharge the responsibilities of the executorship.

The petition to remove the executor was brought by a co-beneficiary to the estate, the sister of the former executor, after the executor failed to open a separate trust account and to file federal or state income tax returns for the trust. Additionally, the petition charged that the respondent’s neglect of the real property held by the limited liability company caused it to sell for a price much less than two previous offers to purchase the real estate, which the executor had rejected.

Prior to suspending the executor from his role of managing the estate, the co-beneficiary filed two-petitions with the Surrogate’s Court. The first, seeking the executor’s removal from management of the estate and the second asking the court to compel the executor into account and file the estate. The court subsequently issued a 45-day order for the executor to account for the estate and file the necessary paperwork.

The record of retirement investment and trust fund fraud is extensive, and not restricted to sales agents, fiduciaries, and retirement investment advisers.

In New York, attorney malpractice in the area of retirement investment and estate planning has led to professional activism by the New York Bar Association and national affiliation the New York Bar Association, and punitive action by the courts. The Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection is an independent public trust, financed by attorney registration fees.

The Fund reimburses legal clients for “losses caused by dishonest conduct of former New York State lawyers,” including theft of estate assets and falsely promised and paid for legal services. Adopted by the American Bar Association House of Delegates, the Model Rules for Lawyers’ Funds for Client Protection enacted August 9, 1989 is an amendment of the Model Rules for Clients’ Security Funds first ratified in 1981.  

New York laws of intestacy and probate do not allow an executor to sell real estate or property belonging to a decedent’s estate where no will is present without official appointment by the Surrogate’s Court of the jurisdiction where the case has been filed. If a decedent’s will does not deny sale of real property and other assets, the executor can sell a property without the consent of beneficiaries or probate proceedings. The power of a fiduciary representative in such case, depends on the terms of a decedent’s last will and testament.

Fiduciary Appointment and Duty

According to New York statute, in probate cases where no will is present, an administrator, rather than an executor must be appointed for probate distribution of estate assets to proceed. This includes fiduciary liquidation of the decedent’s financial assets such as stocks, bonds, bank accounts, and sale of real estate. All proceeds are to be deposited into the estate’s holdings for distribution after all creditor claims, legal fees, and other expenses have been satisfied.

A King County Surrogate’s Court judge recently handed down a significant ruling in the case of a caretaker who appeared to marry her elderly patient in his final days in an effort to claim part of the deceased’s estate. The judge hearing the case decided the woman forfeited her statutory share of the estate because she knowingly married the deceased while he was alive and mentally incapacitated.

The ruling came down after a 37-day trial and nearly 12-years of litigation surrounding the $5 million estate of a successful businessman who was 100-years old when he passed away in 2006. The now deceased married his caretaker in secret in from of the New York City Clerk’s Office, without the knowledge of his two adult sons who brought the challenges to the estate.

The judge said he found it impossible that the deceased’s wife did not know her husband was mentally incapacitated when they married just a year before the man’s death.. “The evidence presented shows consistent, insidious and duplicitous conduct that led to” the wife’s “clandestine marriage” to the deceased, the judge said.

Rarely is there a more interesting circumstance presented an attorney of an estate law practice than a matter implicated with bioethics. Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (“ARTs”) have created a range of reproduction options for infertile individuals. The result is that human conception or artificial insemination (“AI”) in vitro fertilization (“IVF”) and cryopreservation refined by the scientific assisted reproduction process through innovation of new technologies, has created the conditions for new rule elements within law.

ARTs and Statutory (Pro-)Creation

At the heart of the legal debate lies the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of the fundamental principle of rights to procreation. For example, cryopreservation (cryogenic freezing) is one of the latest technologies incorporating IVF and incorporated in IVF, which allows for storage and preservation of reproductive material. While the technology offers advantages for improving the success rate of IVF, cryopreservation implicates the inheritance laws of U.S. states in its potential for the posthumous conception of children.