Articles Posted in Medicaid Planning

A Wall Street Journal article this weekend asked some tough questions about the availability of Medicaid nationwide. Our New York Medicaid attorneys realize that many local residents are understandably concerned about the program in our state–it is an essential lifeline for many seniors. The latest WSJ article suggest that some states are making it harder for individuals to receive Medicaid help to pay for long-term care costs–however, the “crack down” on Medicaid expenditures is advancing very differently in certain states.

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicaid now accounts for about 40% of long-term care spending nationwide. The program is a joint state and federal effort that provides healthcare resources for those unable to afford it. There are federal qualification guidelines, but states are free to work within those guidelines to set specific standards about what is required before a resident is able to receive Medicaid support. As a result of this state flexibility, there can be significant differences in qualification factors in different parts of the country.

Considering that most state are experiencing budget shortfalls, many are looking into different ways to save on these costs. Of course, New York Medicaid changes and proposals are frequently in the news, as local policymakers continue to explore various ways to save money. As the article notes, some of those proposed changes include tinkering with the ways that the state can recover costs from the estates of those who used the program. Our New York elder law estate planning attorneys work closely on those issues, following along with all changes in the law so that local families are best positioned to receive the care they need while saving as many assets as allowable under the law.

Some mistakenly dismiss elder law issues as something with which they need not concern themselves until they personally need help getting by each day. However, our New York City elder law attorneys have worked with many local residents on these issues decades before they need care themselves. That is because many adult children are forced to deal with these concerns on behalf of their parents–many of whom have serious health concerns that arise quite quickly.

With demographic changes leading to a boom in the elderly population, the need to care for aging parents is catching more and more adult children by surprise. According to the AARP, more than 42 million individuals (usually adult children) provide caregiving for elderly friends and family. Another 61.6 million provide partial caregiving support at various times throughout the year. A story from Life Stages discussed the very serious worries faced by those who are unexpectedly forced to wade through a myriad of confusing and complex issues (including many related to elder law) when their parents can no longer get by on their own each day.

The story profiles one woman whose story is shared by many in our area. Her eighty three year old mother had a massive stroke last summer which led to her becoming paralyzed. Her father, also eighty-three years old, was unable to provide the care that she needed. The hospital recommended that the mother be moved into a nursing home. Before taking that step, the daughter wanted to learn if she had any other options.

There is no easy way for a family to deal with a senior grappling with a cognitive mental disease like dementia or Alzheimer’s. Like any health problems faced by loved ones, a family’s initial reaction is to try to get the senior the help they need. However, each New York elder law attorney at our firm understands that cognitive conditions are tricky, because the injury is not physical and often the senior may not be fully aware that they are even suffering from the problem at all.

One elder law advocate recently discussed this challenge in response to a reader question explaining her family’s difficulty dealing with her mother’s dementia. As published in the L.A. Times, the reader revealed that her 82-year old mother, who has dementia, began accusing the family of spying on her. As a result, the mother admitted to her doctor that she wouldn’t share anything about her health with them. The family has been left wondering what to do to help their ailing matriarch get through this difficult phase. Many local families visit our New York elder law estate planning attorneys with the same concerns about helping relative with cognitive issues.

For one thing, in many cases a doctor will not be willing (or legally able) to discuss the mother’s condition without legal documents in place. This is particularly true when the doctor suspects that there may be a family rift. Creating those legal documents is a large part of the work done by elder law estate planning lawyers. The documents help ensure that the senior can receive help with their legal, financial, and healthcare decisions. Creating a trust may allow a third party to manage an ailing senior’s assets. A durable Power of Attorney allows financial decisions to be made by another. Health Care Proxies are needed to make key medical decision when another is unable to do it on their own.

target=”_blank”

Yet another company, Northwestern Mutual, has recently issued a “Cost of Long-Term Care” study. Of course, the results indicate that the actual cost depends on a range of factors including what part of the country one lives, whether an at-home aide is hired, or whether one moves into a skilled nursing facility. As any New York elder law attorney can attest, our area is always at the very top of the list when it comes to long-term care costs. It is for that reason that it is particularly incumbent upon area resident to meet with an elder law attorney to plan ahead before the costs actually need to be paid. It is simply impossible for most families to bear the financial burden of this care on their own.

This latest research effort from Northwestern Mutual involved surveys from 6,000 different sources, including a mix of assisted living facilities, home health care organizations, and nursing homes. The researchers found that the hourly rate for home healthcare workers was anywhere from $33 per hour to $15 per hour. New York assistance was near the highest of the group.

Our New York elder law estate planning lawyers understand that handling long-term planning issues can be particularly delicate when there are second marriages involved. However, it is in these situations, with blended families, when this sort of planning is absolutely critical. Many adult children have natural concern when their parent remarries. Obviously there are inheritance planning issues, and it is vital that seniors who remarry make their wishes very clear about who they’d like to receive what. Failure to do so opens the door to strong disagreement and infighting between those involved. The family glue can come undone even among blood relatives, and there are often even less ties keeping fights in check when blended families are involved.

Beyond inheritance issues, local families should also take note of the New York elder law concerns which are implicated by second marriages and blended families. Decisions about naming a Health Care Proxy and Power of Attorney in the event of disability can present some disagreement when seniors remarry.

An article this weekend in the Laurel Leader-Call referred to another issue regarding the long-term care planning problem in the context of second marriages. The story discussed two seniors who met at an assisted living facility, fell in love, and married. Eventually one of the partners began a physical and mental decline and needed to be moved to a nursing home. The couple did not realize that Medicaid could have been applied for to help support those nursing home costs. If the partner whose health deteriorated passes away, their life savings may be entirely exhausted in providing for the long-term care. As a result, the surviving spouse is often left in dire straits when his or her own health deteriorates and they have a need for skilled nursing care. What often happens is that adult children are forced to scramble in crisis mode to figure out how to pay for the care the elder needs. A range of issues are present when those adult children are step-children who may not have as close a connection with the senior.

The Nieman Watchdog–Harvard’s journalism faculty blog–recently published a commentary speaking to the looming “retirement crisis” and the problems with the federal government’s current approach to dealing with it. The author notes that retirement planning is not what it used to be as many workers today are “facing a grim future in which the kind of retirement plans their parents were able to take for granted is out of reach.” Our New York elder law attorneys have discussed these changing dynamics and the demand they place on thinking about long-term care plans in new ways.

The commentary notes that it is folly to presume that one will be taken care of in the future, because the growth of “defined contribution plans” (as opposed to “defined benefits plans”) means that retirement savings often hinge on the performance of the markets. It is argued that this shift has made income from private pensions smaller and less reliable than in the past. That issue, coupled with rising health care costs, places a real strain on many retirement plans.

Considering those concerns, it is perhaps surprising that federal policymakers have spent most of their time discussing cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The problem also exists at the state level, as New York Medicaid planners have been forced to watch as state policymakers consider a wide range of proposals to revamp the healthcare system that so many local seniors rely on for long-term care support.

All those with an eye toward New York Medicaid planning have been closely following the actions of the federal “Super Committee.” This unique federal, bipartisan committee was charged with coming up with a long-term federal deficit reduction plan totaling $1.2 trillion over 10 years. Failure to reach an agreement on any plan will trigger automatic and deep cuts to a variety of federal funding areas, including Medicaid. Considering that New York Medicaid programs are funded jointly by the federal government and state government (including local governing bodies), the Super Committee’s decision (or lack of decision) may ultimately have significant impact on local program participants.

We now know that the Super Committee has reportedly not reached an agreement. This means that the triggered cuts will likely take effect, so long as national leaders don’t reach some other agreement. This presents a troublesome situation for all those who rely on these programs for basic services; though it remains unknown exactly what effect the potential cuts will have on local residents. In a pre-emptive move, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo sent a letter to the state’s congressional delegation last week urging them to do everything in their power to prevent blanket cuts that may do much more long-term fiscal harm than good.

In the letter, reprinted in the Times Union, the Governor reminded our state’s federal delegation that the Super Committee’s actions or the resulting automatic cuts will “have a direct and significant impact on the finances and economy of the state of New York.” Recognizing the long-term viability problems caused by our current federal debt, the Governor argued that progress can be made on the debt front without taking an axe to New York Medicaid and other programs that local citizens have come to rely on.

Syracuse News reported this week on public concern over changes that are about to take effect within the New York Medicaid system. Per the planned alterations, many local residents with developmental disabilities will lose their caseworkers as that task is soon to be outsourced to non-profit agencies in the state. Currently, many of these residents receive assistance from a group of public employees known as Medicaid service coordinators. However, these residents have been instructed that by the end of this week they must select a non-profit to take over this function.

Many community members are concerned about the effect the changes will have on their vulnerable family members with disabilities who have grown familiar with their personal caseworkers over many years. The service coordinators function as advocates for program participants, developing relationships with the clients and helping their family find the services that they need. Many coordinators have helped families find appropriate educational opportunities, arrange for respite care, and have linked participants with employment programs. Our New York Medicaid attorneys are aware of the complications that are intrinsic in working through the Medicaid system, as we also devote our time helping local residents work within the system to protect their assets while receiving the resources that they need to get by each day.

Cost-cutting is the state’s motivation for changing the way the services are provided. The state spokesman for the Office for People with Developmental Disabilities reported that non-profit agencies already handle roughly eighty percent of Medicaid service coordination in the state. Nonprofit agencies explain that they are prepared to handle their expanded role. However, they also report that it may be difficult to complete the transition in a month–which is the goal of the administration. Even if the changes go through, there is a chance that families may be able to remain with the same service coordinator if that coordinator is hired by a nonprofit after leaving the state payroll. The program shift will allow the state to cut 300 service coordinators who had previously served about 10,000 local residents. Current service coordinators may try to approve an amended contract and submit it to the state in an effort to halt the layoffs. However, there is no guarantee that the privatization effort will be halted.

Last week state legislators proposed New York Medicaid changes which would eliminate the financial involvement of local county governments–a state take-over of the program. However, this change would do nothing to curb the overall costs of the program. Lawmakers explain that reigning in Medicaid costs remains a top priority, and so additional alterations to the program are likely. Many observers are calling for tighter enforcement rules to root out fraud. Stricter enforcement of the program will likely target medical care providers who seek to collect money, but these changes may also affect individual residents who are working through the New York Medicaid application process.

An editorial in last Friday’s Albany Times Union called upon the legislature not to go “soft” on Medicaid users. Recent problems of fraud in institutions serving those with developmental disabilities were used to highlight the current problem with the program. Some observers believe that homes for those who are unable to live independently because of age or disability are the site of the clearest patterns of excessive Medicaid utilization. Several years ago the New York Commission on Quality of Care and Advocacy for the Mentally Disabled noted that Medicaid billing for these services were “costly, fragmented, sometimes unnecessary, and often appeared to be revenue-driven, rather than based on medical necessity.”

Senior care advocates believe that many disabled seniors find themselves in need of dental care, hearing aids, and similar basic services only to be shuffled to alternative medical appointments not of their choosing or tailored to their need. These advocates claim that Medicaid changes are necessary to correct the disconnect between needed services and the ones actually provided. On top of the programmatic problems, the state’s Long Term Care Coalition noted that the Health Department lacks the resources to oversee these adult homes properly. The state body struggles to ensure that nursing homes and senior living facilities are abiding by state rules and regulations. The quality of elder care suffers as a result.

While it slipped under the radar this year for many families, the first Sunday after Labor Day is Grandparents Day. As explained this week in the Daily Local, the holiday has been the topic of a presidential proclamation every year since 1978. More recently it has been used as a time to raise awareness of the continuing needs of many grandparents in nursing homes and the importance of helping our elders conduct long-term care planning. Considering that the majority of area seniors remain concerned about their future quality of life, our New York elder care attorneys know that all occasions are good ones to discuss these long-term care issues.

The non-profit association which champions Grandparents Day each year explained how the group has been working to help families take steps that will keep their elders in their own homes, instead of nursing homes. Efforts to transition away from nursing home care are growing in popularity nationwide. Our New York elder law estate planning lawyers have long recognized that most area seniors would prefer to “age in place,” receiving the additional care that they need without being forced to move into a nursing home or other long-term care facility.

However, the financial realities of these situations often mean that it is only those who have taken steps to prepare for this time in their lives that ultimately have the freedom to stay at home. For example, residents who visit a professional early enough to discuss these matters often decide to invest in long-term care insurance (LTCI). This insurance can ensure that the resources will be available when necessary to pay for at-home care when a senior is in need of extra assistance with day-to-day tasks. It is difficult to put a price tag on the peace of mind that comes with knowing one has done everything in their power to ensure that their quality of life will remain as high as possible no matter what the future holds.

Contact Information