Last week state legislators proposed New York Medicaid changes which would eliminate the financial involvement of local county governments–a state take-over of the program. However, this change would do nothing to curb the overall costs of the program. Lawmakers explain that reigning in Medicaid costs remains a top priority, and so additional alterations to the program are likely. Many observers are calling for tighter enforcement rules to root out fraud. Stricter enforcement of the program will likely target medical care providers who seek to collect money, but these changes may also affect individual residents who are working through the New York Medicaid application process.
An editorial in last Friday’s Albany Times Union called upon the legislature not to go “soft” on Medicaid users. Recent problems of fraud in institutions serving those with developmental disabilities were used to highlight the current problem with the program. Some observers believe that homes for those who are unable to live independently because of age or disability are the site of the clearest patterns of excessive Medicaid utilization. Several years ago the New York Commission on Quality of Care and Advocacy for the Mentally Disabled noted that Medicaid billing for these services were “costly, fragmented, sometimes unnecessary, and often appeared to be revenue-driven, rather than based on medical necessity.”
Senior care advocates believe that many disabled seniors find themselves in need of dental care, hearing aids, and similar basic services only to be shuffled to alternative medical appointments not of their choosing or tailored to their need. These advocates claim that Medicaid changes are necessary to correct the disconnect between needed services and the ones actually provided. On top of the programmatic problems, the state’s Long Term Care Coalition noted that the Health Department lacks the resources to oversee these adult homes properly. The state body struggles to ensure that nursing homes and senior living facilities are abiding by state rules and regulations. The quality of elder care suffers as a result.