Wills

Exception Proves the Rule: Joe Paterno’s Will Sealed

Published on: June 12, 2012 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Most local residents cherish their privacy. That extends to privacy in sensitive matters like estate planning. When considering estate planning, the first thing that comes to mind for many is the traditional will. Our New York estate planning lawyers frequently explain how there are now many more tools beyond wills to properly tailor these affairs. Trusts are often far-superior ways to pass on assets and protect loved ones down the road. One of the many benefits that a trust can provide is privacy. Wills do not provide that privacy.

Public Records

Even though wills contain private, sometimes sensitive information, at a certain point they become public records, open to view to anyone interested. A will must be filed with the court during the probate process to settle affairs following a death. The court will eventually file the will in its records, where it becomes available to the public. This means that anyone can usually access the documents at a courthouse, often having the ability to make their own copy of the material.

The Complex Issues of Disinheritance

Published on: April 10, 2012 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Delineating what family members, friends, and charities will inherit after one’s death is a large part of New York estate planning. However, intrinsic in the process is also distinguishing who will not receive any part of one’s estate. Disinheritance is therefore just as much a part of the process as anything else. There are many high-profile stories of wealthy families who have children intentionally ignored in the inheritance process.

Perhaps the most well-known example involves “Mommie Dearest,” Joan Crawford, who disinherited her children “for reasons known to them.”

However, the issues involved affect all families, not just the rich. An MSNBC story last month touched on some of the complex motivations woven into disinheritance.

Common Estate Planning Mistakes

Published on: January 17, 2012 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Last week an article in the Mansfield Patch listed “Five Vital Estate Planning Mistakes” made by local community members. The list touched on a few issues that each New York estate planning lawyer in our firm has seen time and again. Like history, these errors tend to repeat themselves. Being aware of the common problems is the best way to ensure you don’t make them yourself.

Of course common mistake number one is putting off estate planning efforts entirely. Passing on is usually not a topic that most enjoy thinking about. Estate plans inherently involve some considerations and preparations in the event that one is no longer alive, and so many simply avoid the idea altogether. This delay ultimately serves no purpose. As the article author remarks tough-in-cheek, “If you don’t die before retirement, chances are pretty good you’ll die sometimes afterwards.” Considering that death is inevitable, there is simply no logical reason to do no planning and risk paying more in taxes, the uncertainty of the probate process, or the potential squabbling of family members.

Second on the list was failure to consider naming guardians for one’s children. While most local residents conducting New York estate planning have adult children, planning is important for younger community members as well, particularly those who have young children. When crafting an elder law estate plan for clients, we always take into account the family dynamics involved. When young children are present it is important to make plans for those children in the event something happens to you, the parent. This is another task that is often put off, because it is not pleasant to think about orphaned youngsters. However, at the end of the day failing to name a guardian only means that the buck will be passed to some other decision maker if anything happens–usually the court. No one is better positioned than a parent to name a potential replacement in case of tragedy, and so it is always prudent for parents to do so.

Some Estate Fights Last For Decades–The MLK Example

Published on: December 19, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Many local families create their New York estate plan with potential family feuds in minds. History is replete with examples of siblings, parents, children, in-laws, and others being torn apart following disagreement regarding the passing of assets at the death of a loved one. Legal challenges following a death are very common. The legal fights are even more likely to occur when a significant amount of assets are involved, there is surprise about how they will be distributed, or inadequate estate planning has been conducted forcing the matter to be decided in the courtroom. Many parents have made the mistake of assuming that “the kids will figure it out” when it comes time to pass on assets. Unfortunately, that exact mindset has led to entire families descended into dispute. The fighting can last for years or, in some cases, even decades.

For example, last week Forbes touched on the case of the famed civil rights legend Martin Luther King Jr. MLK had not created an estate plan before he died; he did not even have a will. As a result, the distribution of his affairs was left entirely to the courts with the predictable family fighting that ensued–and still continues. Some time ago the King family children engaged in a series of back-and-forth legal battles following the creation of a corporation to manage King’s estate. The lawsuits lasted for years before a settlement was finally reached between the children.

However, the possession of certain assets continues to be fought by the corporation (The Estate of Martin Luther King Jr., Inc.). Recently the estate sued the son of one of the Reverend’s former secretaries (an old family friend) claiming that the secretary possessed historical documents related to MLK. The documents apparently include handwritten letters, speech transcripts, newsletters, and similar materials. According to the secretary, Dr. King gave her the documents over the years, and she always assumed them to be her personal property. He apparently never asked for them back over the decade and a half that the secretary worked for the Reverend.

New Twist in Huguette Clark Estate Plan Controversy

Published on: November 30, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Yesterday there was a new twist in the high-profile New York estate planning story involving Huguette Clark, the woman who died this year leaving behind a $400 million Gilded Age fortune. As we discussed earlier this week, the woman’s family was not provided for in her will. Instead her fortune was given mostly to a newly created art charity with some benefits going to her long-time nurse, attorney, and accountant. Instead of using various trusts to ensure the woman’s estate was transferred seamless per her wishes, her New York estate planning attorney surprisingly utilized only a will. Expectedly, the will has been challenged by the woman’s family.

However, new information was just released revealing that Ms. Clark actually signed two wills, one only a few weeks before the other. According to a report by MSNBC, both wills were genuine, meaning that they were properly executed. The first will, seemingly revoked by the signing of the second will, would have left her fortune to her family. The family filed the first will with the court yesterday–the first step in what will assuredly be a prolonged battled over the Clark family millions. The attorney representing the disinherited family members claimed that the case involved “undue influence and exploitation of a very elderly and extraordinarily wealthy woman at the hands of two professionals who, with the help of certain others…ultimately stripped her of her free will, as well as millions of dollars.”

As this situation demonstrates, it is incredibly ill-advised for any family to rely solely on a will to conduct inheritance planning, especially for families with large amounts of wealth. Like clockwork they almost always cause more problems than they solve. Will contests are common and virtually guaranteed to occur when two wills are signed in short succession with family members being cut out between them. In this case, while twenty one relatives would have split the fortune in the first will, the second gave a large amount to a nurse, small sums to an accountant and lawyer, and then put the rest in an art foundation that was to be managed by the same lawyer and accountant. That chain of events raises many red flags about the influence that the small group of individuals who benefitted from the second will had on the woman. It is made even more suspect by the fact that the estate planning attorney who was to benefit from the will was the same one that drew it up.

Questions Remain About Huguette Clark’s $400 Million New York Estate Plan

Published on: November 28, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

New York estate planning is a necessity for virtually all local residents, no matter where on the income scale one falls. Easing the emotional, social, and financial burden on one’s family and ensuring wishes are carried out upon one’s death is important if one has $400,000 or $400 million to pass on. Unfortunately, New York estate planning mistakes are made at all income levels, often with serious results for the individuals involved. The most common mistake includes not taking advantage of all of the legal tools available. For example, while wills are still commonly thought of as a basic estate planning necessity, in truth they are becoming obsolete for many families. Trusts are much more useful in that they can avoid probate and provide for substitute decision-making if disability strikes. Yet, many local residents, including those with vast fortunes, still fail to take advantage of the benefits that trusts bring.

One high-profile local example is that of Huguette Clark. The reclusive heir to her father’s copper and mining fortune died earlier this year at the age of 105. She was rumored to have more than $400 million at the time of her passing–an estate she inherited upon her father’s death over eighty five years ago in 1925. Ms. Clark had been a mysterious figure, having lived in a hospital room since the late 1980s. She left her Fifth Avenue apartment empty for over twenty two years even though she was in relatively good health until just before her passing. Ms. Clark was long estranged from her family, and only a very small and intimate group of advisors had any contact with her for the last quarter century.

Surprisingly, even though she had such a large estate, Ms. Clark’s advisors never had her create a trust to protect her long-term financial affairs. An article about her story published today by Forbes explains how most estate planning attorneys would have at least advised the client to utilize a revocable living trust, instead of a will. The need for a trust was made even more necessary considering the size of Ms. Clark’s wealth. In addition, there are questions about the terms of the will–drafted and signed when Ms. Clark was ninety eight years old. The will left most of the woman’s fortune to a newly created art fund and gave a significant amount to Ms. Clark’s long-time nurse. However, the will also named a partner in the very law firm that drafted the will as a beneficiary. Even if this was the exact intent of Ms. Clark, the potential conflict of interest issues would usually counsel the firm in question not to prepare the will. Many other questions remain surrounding her advisors spending over $100 million of her estate in the last two decades of her life.

Estate Planning Tips For Providing One Child a Larger Share of Inheritance

Published on: September 12, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

There is often a default assumption that local parents wish to provide all of their children with equal shares of an inheritance as part of their New York estate plan. However, no two families are identical, and there are a variety of reasons why some parents feel it necessary to provide different assets to each of their children upon their death. The ability to tailor an inheritance using rules different than the default to suit a family’s specific desires is one of the main reasons why local families seek the assistance of New York estate planning lawyers. As one lawyer put it, “there’s nothing so unequal as the equal treatment of unequals.”

Most families take a variety of factors into account when deciding how to distribute their property. For example, one child may already be more financially successful, another may have a larger family of their own, and yet another may be estranged from the family. In other cases a parent may have already helped one child while alive–such as by providing down payment money on a house–and want that prior help to be reflected in the inheritance.

A Wall Street Journal story this weekend discussed how many families have questions about the best way to go about giving one child a larger share than another. Trusts are usually a more effective estate planning tool than a will. However, if a will is used, it is important that certain steps be taken to ensure that the uneven child distribution is capable of withstanding legal challenge. Part of that process involves being open and honest with family members about the inheritance so that children know about the terms while you are alive. This minimizes the surprise factor and may quell later suspicions. Having these conversations is often difficult, so as an alternative a video or instruction letter can be included with the estate planning documents to explain why a certain decision was made.

Estate Plan Still Needed to Divide Properly Equally Between Children

Published on: August 18, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Some local residents believe that they do not need to worry about creating a New York estate plan if they only want to divide all of their assets between their children equally. These community members are under the incorrect assumption that the default legal rules will ensure that everything works out as they wish. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case.

This weekend My SA News discussed this all-too-common mistake of voicing intent to be even-handed with asset distribution but not taking the proper legal steps to carry out that intent. For example, the story used the real example of a family with two parents and five daughters. Both parents had been married to one another their entire lives with no divorces. They did not conduct any estate planning because they always explained that they wanted everything to be divided equally among their children at their death. They did not even have wills drafted.

However, their actions did not reflect that voiced intention, and there was no plan in place to protect the family. For example, after the father died, the mother deeded the family home to the first sister. Later, a second sister deeded another house to the mother, but upon the mother’s death that sister wanted the home back. A third sister visited an attorney and asked for help. She wanted the family home and the second home to be divided equally among the children as the parents always wished.

Estate Planning is Not Just for Senior Couples

Published on: August 2, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

Some area residents may think that New York estate planning is only for married seniors who have big families and substantial wealth. Fortunately, more and more people are coming to understand that this planning is a necessity for all community members, no matter what their situation in life. The Calgary Herald recently discussed the universal applicability of estate planning by sharing the example of a thirty-six year old mother of two who was recently divorced. The woman had never before seriously considered financial matters, but everything changed following separation from her husband.

It was not long before the mother began to realize that taking care of her family was now squarely on her shoulders–necessitating prudent preparation for long-term contingencies. For example, if she were to suddenly become ill, who would take care of her children? If she became disabled, how would the family survive? The woman began considering these and similar questions before realizing that she wanted the peace of mind of knowing that she had prepared for these possibilities ahead of time. The woman visited an estate planning attorney and learned what options were available to her. She eventually purchased life insurance, disability insurance, and had legal documents drafted to ensure others could make critical decisions on behalf of her family if the need arose.

The mother’s situation is a good example of why estate planning is often particularly important for singles. Those without a partner frequently need to clearly spell out their wishes ahead of time, because fewer people may be around to speak on their behalf. For example, a thirty year old single man may get in an accident shortly before closing on his first piece of real estate. If he has taken the time to create a durable Power of Attorney, the named individual may be able to close on that new home on his behalf. There are countless similar situations that may arise where prior estate preparation can significantly affect an individual’s life.

$100 Million Estate Finally Reaches Relatives After 92 Years

Published on: June 2, 2011 | by Ettinger Law Firm

An important benefit of visiting with a New York estate planning lawyer to help with your asset planning is that on top of carrying out your wishes, the professional can share avenues available to you of which you may not be aware. For example, many area residents are under the impression that their will is nothing more than a document that specifically divvies up assets. In reality wills can be crafted in virtually unlimited ways depending on specific family dynamics and the ethical values of the testator.

Perhaps no high-profile case better illustrates the complexity with which a will can be drafted than the story of Wellington R. Burt. At one point one of the richest men in America, Mr. Burt made his wealth in the robber baron age and was primarily involved in the lumber industry. Mr. Burt lived to age 87, passing away in his Michigan mansion in 1919 with an estimated net worth around $60 million.

The lumber giant gained notoriety following his death as the details of his will were revealed. Mr. Burt was particularly careful to ensure that his living relatives received only a small part of his fortune. To avenge an apparent family feud, Mr. Burt left his children relatively small annual payments from $1,000 to $5,000–except for one favored son who received $30,000 yearly. The rest of the man’s estate was held in trust until 21 years after the death of his last direct descendant alive at the time of his death.

ABC News reported recently that that final requirement was met in 2010–92 years after Mr. Burt’s passing. Mr. Burt’s last grandchild died in 1989, triggering the 21 year wait which finally expired in 2010. Last month the twelve descendants of the lumber tycoon reached an agreement to split up the estate now valued over $100 million. Based on seniority, the individuals received values ranging from $16 million to $2.5 million.

While a “spite clause” is perhaps not advisable for many area families, the case of Wellington Burt stands as an evidence of the immense flexibility that exists to all those considering what to do with their assets following death.
Continue Reading ›