Articles Posted in Asset Protection

Most local residents will nod in agreement when one explains the importance of conducting New York estate planning as soon as possible. It is easy for most to understand the value of planning an inheritance, saving on taxes, and preparing for alternative decision makers. Yet, all estate planning lawyers know that there is a difference between recognizing the importance of a task and actually taking the time to get it done. Psychologists have found that when it comes to making the leap from knowing that a task should be completed to actually doing it, personal examples are usually the most effective motivators. It is one thing to learn about the value of planning, it is another to hear about a specific case of proper planning that helped an actual person. In fact, experts have also found that even more effective than stories of positive benefits are stories of plans gone awry. The stick is often more persuasive than the carrot.

That is where the estate planning misadventures of the rich and famous can be useful. Unfortunately, recent history is replete with stories of many well-known figures who did not take care of their affairs properly (or at all) before their passing. This week the SM Mirror ran down a quick list of some of the more well-known cases of celebrity estate planning blunders. A few included examples:

Jimi Hendrix

New York estate planning mishaps and disputes often make headlines when they involve large sums of wealth and larger-than-life characters. Perhaps none has received more publicity recently than that surrounding the “grand dame of New York City society,” Brooke Astor. Ms. Astor died four years ago at the ripe age of one hundred and five. However, inheritance and tax issues continue to rage around her estate and they show no sign of nearing a resolution. As discussed in Forbes, seven new lawsuits were recently filed by her estate refuting IRS demands that she owe an additional $62 million in taxes.

It seems that one of the key issues is the overall size of her estate. Every New York estate planning lawyer knows that the total value of an estate is a fundamental factor in evaluating the overall tax burden. A smaller taxable estate means a smaller tax. In some cases, if an estate is below a certain threshold, then certain taxes need not be paid at all. That is why most tax litigation involves dispute between the government and the individual (or their estate) about the total value of taxable assets. In this case, the government claims that the value of Ms. Astor’s estate is $223 million, but representatives for Ms. Astor say the figure is around $93 million. Tens of millions of dollars in potential taxes hang in the balance depending on what sum the court ultimately decides is accurate. The tax bill could be anywhere from $35 million to $97 million. The disagreement between the parties centers mostly on charitable bequests (totaling $96 million) that the estate claims can be deducted but which the IRS disputes. In addition, the IRS claims that there was $20 million in lifetime gifts which should have been included. Part of the IRS request includes over $2 million in penalties for the failure to file and pay those gift taxes properly.

The estate admits that certain gift tax returns were not filed. However, many of those gifts were to her son, who was earlier convicted of 14 different crimes related to neglecting her care and stealing from her estate. Many estate planning attorneys have used the drama surrounding Ms. Astor’s estate and her son’s crimes as an example of what can go wrong when a Power of Attorney is in the wrong hands. As the Forbes article author noted, “the Astor case is a reminder to families that it’s important to make sure you get these basic estate and disability planning document right.”

Last month Forbes discussed an estate feud that brewed followed the suicide death of a reality show star. Late this summer, the 47-year old star of “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills,” Russell Armstrong, took his own life. His wife, Taylor Armstrong, had filed for divorce shortly before the death. However, the divorce was not final at the time of Mr. Armstrong’s passing, meaning that per the rules of the state she was the next of kin. As such she maintained a certain level of control over his affairs–including his funeral and burial plans. Without instructions to the contrary in estate planning documents, even estranged spouses may maintain this control.

Making matters worse in this situation, it appears that Mrs. Armstrong never maintained a good relationship with her former husband’s family. As a result, she did not initially tell the family about the funeral, burial, or memorial plans. The man’s parents and siblings wanted his remains buried in his home state of Texas, but Mrs. Armstrong claimed that she wanted to bury him in Los Angeles. It remains unclear exactly how the ugly situation will be resolved.

Unfortunately, the burial dispute may be just the beginning. Depending on Mr. Armstrong’s estate planning documents, his estranged wife may still be entitled to inherit most of his assets. That is why it is important to seek out professional help in the middle of a divorce. Otherwise, there is no telling what might happen. As the article notes, “Fights over the estate of someone who passed away in the midst of a divorce are especially common.” Other recent high-profile examples include the deaths’ of Dennis Hopper and Gary Coleman.

For decades our New York estate planning lawyers have helped local residents use living trusts instead of wills to plan their affairs. For many clients a will simply creates more problems than it solves. For example, yesterday the Wall Street Journal published a story exploring the myriad of issues faced by a will executor–the person named to manage the estate of a deceased individual in a will. It was explained how a wide variety of complex tasks are required of the executor, there are legal repercussions when mistakes are made, and many relationships are ruined in the process of settling the estate.

Executors are often siblings or other family members of the deceased. It is the executor’s job to administer a will through the probate process by accounting for assets, paying debts, and distributing property. Red tape, complexity, tedium, and relationship conflicts are inherent in the process. Many professionals in the field report that there has been a steady increase in the number of “executorships gone bad.” Some believe that recent economic troubles have led to more inheritance fights as of late, complicating the executor’s job even further. When a will is challenged by an heir (a frequent occurrence), the executor is usually thrown into the middle of depositions, court appearances, and other legal situations that most would prefer to avoid.

Observers admit that the role of executor is generally not suited for amateurs. Often the individual is required to be aware of taxation rules, potential conflicts of interest, and even investment strategies like picking stocks and bonds. All of this comes with little pay, because state guidelines set the amount of money that an executor can receive.

A Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT) is one of the best tools available for seniors who do not have long-term care insurance to protect their assets from the staggering cost of nursing home care. This weekend our New York elder law attorney, Bonnie Kraham Esq., had a story published in the Times Herald-Record where she explained the value of this trust for local residents. The article highlighted the specific ways that a MAPT can help local seniors save assets for their family and dispelled misconceptions that some have about creating the trust.

A MAPT is a legal entity that a resident creates with the help of a professional to protect assets from being consumed in order to pay for long-term caregiving costs in the future–usually nursing home care. To create the trust, a resident transfers assets (such as the family home) into the separate legal entity and names someone other than themselves or their spouse as trustee to manage the assets in the trust. The senior may then be able to keep those assets down the road while still qualifying for Medicaid assistance if needed to pay for nursing home care.

Contrary to some misperceptions, local seniors who create a New York Medicaid Asset Protection Trust do not forever “lock up” all of their assets or lose the power to alter what happens to their property. The lifestyle of the senior who creates the trust is usually unaffected, because they still receive pension checks and Social Security checks directly, and they retain the exclusive right to use their home just as before while keeping their home tax exemptions. These trusts are irrevocable, but New York law actually allows the trust to be revoked with written consent of all involved parties. In addition, the individual who creates the trust can amend it to change the beneficiaries at any time.

Earlier this year Congressional hearings were held on the often forgotten problem of elder financial exploitation. Federal officials are still considering a variety of legislative options to protect victims of these crimes and hold wrongdoers properly accountable. Our New York elder law attorneys know that many residents in our area fall victim to predatory actions that often deplete resources built up over a lifetime. The problem takes many forms, from identity theft and scams to manipulation by trusted caregivers. Surprisingly, much financial abuse is perpetrated by friends and family members who exploit the senior’s vulnerability for personal enrichment.

While legislative actions may be helpful to better protect seniors from this exploitation, the first line of defense is proper individual financial preparation. Taking proactive steps to minimize the risk of being taken advantage of is the best way each individual resident can protect themselves. For example, a comprehensive story at TBO News explained this week that identity theft can usually be prevented if simple steps are followed. This includes refusing to give personal information over the telephone, deleting unsolicited emails that ask for personal information, and not carrying Social Security cards and multiple credits cards at the same time. Additionally, seniors should be sure to shred personal mail, stop mail before going on vacation, be cautious with online shopping, and frequently review financial statements.

While identity theft is a common fear, most seniors are much more likely to be financially exploited by family and friends. To guard against this mistreatment, local advocates agree that it is important to have a New York elder care plan in place so that trained eyes are aware of your financial situation. Beyond that, simple steps can help to limit one’s risk of being victimized. It remains important never to give blank checks for others to fill in the amount, sign complicated papers that you don’t understand, or give others unlimited access to financial information. In addition, seniors should always work with their banks to control who has access to funds.

Local residents visit our New York estate planning attorneys for professional assistance to protect and pass on their assets. Many also expect guidance identifying the items that should be considered an asset and included in the planning. Most area families need to consider things beyond homes, cars, investment portfolios, and similar items when creating their New York estate plan.

For example, what happens to frequent flier miles and rewards upon an individual’s death? Many residents spend years and thousands of dollars in airfare racking up mileages and benefits in airline sponsored loyalty programs. A recent article in Payments News explained how many fliers spend time accumulating these “miles” and rewards only to leave them unused at their death. Some reports indicate that as many as 3.5 trillion miles currently remain unused in these programs. Interestingly, each airline has a different policy in place regarding transferability of loyalty benefits at death. American Airlines specifically allows accumulated mileage credit to be transferred to a person named in a court-approved will or estate plan. Other carriers, such as United Airlines, require that a beneficiary be named with the program, a fee be paid, and require an executor to contact the airline before miles can be transferred.

Another asset which one may wish to leave behind is the option to purchase valuable season tickets. Area residents often spend years waiting for the opportunity to become a season-ticket holder for their favorite teams. A post this weekend at The Faculty Lounge recently discussed this topic. Most teams have policies in place that allow an individual’s decedents to gain the right to purchase. However, it is important to closely examine the team policy related to ticket transferability to understand what issues might arise. For example, there may be conflict over who gains the right if several children share in ones’ assets. Many team policies indicate that there will be no transferability if several individuals share in the right and do not agree on a single transferee. Some teams also expressly prohibit a non-relative from receiving the right to purchase the tickets.

New York inheritance planning involves passing on values as well as assets. No matter how large the family estate, most parents think long and hard about how their inheritance will affect the lives of their children. For many there are no easy answers to questions like how new wealth will affect their children’s independence or how much wealth is the appropriate balance between proper inheritance and philanthropy.

As a story last week in the Belleville News Democrat explained, many parents are taking steps to share important information about the meaning of money as part of their inheritance plan. Most families strive to pass on the right amount of money so that children are provided for but still maintain the incentive to work, strive, and succeed.

One hardworking family, including a 60-year old retired teacher and 62-year old real estate broker, explained how they have worked with their now 30-year old daughter on financial matters, noting “We really want to encourage her to develop a personal financial plan, a personal philosophy, and become really familiar with the types of investments.” The family admits that frankness and early discussions about these issues is important. Children should know what to expect and parents should not be afraid to share their concerns with their loved one.

Some are worried that their loved ones may be unprepared to handle the estate that they receive. Those families often face issues with asset planning for spendthrift children. They are aware that their children are poor at handling money or inexperienced with such matters. Many options exist for parents in those situations. For example, trusts are perfect tools to ensure that a child has access to reasonable assets but is unable to abuse the overall value of the estate. In these situations a designated “trustee” manages the actual estate with rules about what the child receives and when they receive it.
Continue Reading ›

by Michael Ettinger, Attorney at Law funding.gifThe Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT) is a technique commonly used by elder law attorneys. It consists of an irrevocable trust, usually set up by a parent of parents sixty-five and older. One or more of the adult children are named as “trustees” to manage the trust for the benefit of the “beneficiaries” who remain the parents during their lifetimes. For example, the parents retain the right to the exclusive use and enjoyment of the home and the income from all of the trust assets. The establishment and “funding” of the trust, i.e. retitling the home and the investments in the name of the trust, starts the five year look-back period running. After five years, those assets become exempt and are protected from the costs of long-term care.

Once the MAPT is established, there are certain things the parties can and cannot do. Below are a list of the “Do’s and Don’ts” concerning the MAPT.

Do’s
Contact Information